Return to: BBE Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.
 
Biosystems Engineering

What's inside.

About Us

Undergraduate Program

Scholarships

Graduate Program

Research

Extension and Outreach

Faculty and Staff

Centers. Services, and Resources

Contact Us
   

Home

 
  Home > Academics and Students > Undergraduate Program > Courses > ENR 2041 Natural Resource Consumption and Sustainability

ENR 2041 Natural Resource Consumption and Sustainability (3 credits)

Catalog Description:

There are four general objectives of the course:

  1. To expose students to current world population trends and associated demand trends and sources of supply for industrial raw materials.
  2. To examine environmental and other tradeoffs related to various options for satisfying demands/needs for industrial raw materials, with particular attention to wood as an industrial material.
  3. To introduce the concept of global and systematic thinking as a way of beginning to deal with complex environmental problems.
  4. To provide a framework whereby students can begin a process of critical thinking about environmental problems and possible solutions thereto.
Prerequisites:

NA

Class/Laboratory Schedule:

NA

Location:

NA

Instructors:

 

Text:

No text. Packet of required course readings on sale at St. Paul Campus bookstore. Two copies of these packets can be found in the College of Natural Resources Library, on the bottom floor of the Natural Resources Administration Building.

Reading and CD-ROM Assignments:

Reading assignments are indicated on the topic outline for the course. It is important that all reading be completed prior to the class session for which the readings are assigned. Reading assignments not contained in the course packet are found on the internet (see url listed with documentation), as Pdf files on the class website, or in the reserve section of the College of Natural Resources Library.

Grading:

The student’s final grade for the course will be determined by the grades earned on the mid-term examination (25%), the final examination (30%), periodic quizzes (25%), and by class attendance and the quality of participation in daily class discussions (20%). Quizzes (6-7 during the semester) will always be given on Fridays and will cover topics of class discussion, videos, and assigned readings since the previous quiz or written examination. A minimum grade of "C' must be obtained on each of the writing assignments in order to achieve a passing grade in the course.

Course Description:

Nature of Course:

This course consists of a combination of lectures, contemporary readings, videos, and classroom discussion sessions.

Individuals for Whom the Course is Intended:

This course is designed for students enrolled in the University of Minnesota either within or outside of the College of Natural Resources. Though a lower division offering, this course is suitable for any student, regardless of class standing.

Objectives of the Course:

There are four general objectives of the course:

  1. To expose students to current world population trends and associated demand trends and sources of supply for industrial raw materials.
  2. To examine environmental and other tradeoffs related to various options for satisfying demands/needs for industrial raw materials, with particular attention to wood as an industrial material.
  3. To introduce the concept of global and systematic thinking as a way of beginning to deal with complex environmental problems.
  4. To provide a framework whereby students can begin a process of critical thinking about environmental problems and possible solutions thereto.

Course Grading:

The student’s final grade for the course will be determined by the grades earned on the mid-term examination (25%), the final examination (30%), periodic quizzes (25%), and by class attendance and the quality of participation in daily class discussions (20%). Quizzes (6-7 during the semester) will always be given on Fridays and will cover topics of class discussion, videos, and assigned readings since the previous quiz or written examination. A minimum grade of "C' must be obtained on each of the writing assignments in order to achieve a passing grade in the course.

Text:

No text. Packet of required course readings on sale at St. Paul Campus bookstore. Two copies of these packets can be found in the College of Natural Resources Library, on the bottom floor of the Natural Resources Administration Building.

Reading Assignments:

Reading assignments are indicated on the topic outline for the course. It is important that all reading be completed prior to the class session for which the readings are assigned. Reading assignments not contained in the course packet are found on the internet (see url listed with documentation), as Pdf files on the class website, or in the reserve section of the College of Natural Resources Library.

Lecture Notes:

Power point presentations used as part of class lectures will be posted to the class web site within 24 hours of the corresponding class session.

Course Web Site:

vista.umn.edu

In both cases you will need your X500 name and password to gain entry.

Instructor/Office Hours:

Dr. Jim Bowyer, Room 322D Kaufert Laboratory, 8:00 - 9:00 am, M, W. F.

(612) 624-4292
jbowyer@umn.edu

ENR 2041 - Spring 2005
Topic Outline and Reading Assignments

Date Topic Assignment[1]
Jan. 19 Course introduction.  Environmental quiz.  Introduction to world and U.S. population growth.

 

Jan. 21 Origins of concern about population growth.  Population projections.  Assumptions on which projections are based.   What rate of growth is too much? Berreby, D. 1990. The numbers game. Discover, April 1990, pp. 42-49.

Brown, L. 1997.  Reconsidering Malthus for the 21st century.  National Press Club, Wash., D.C.
Jan. 24 The realities of compounding.  Implications of population growth. Schmitt, E. 2001.  U.S. population has biggest 10-year rise ever.  New York Times, April 3.

Peterson, D. 2003.  Minnesota is population magnet.  Mpls Star Tribune, Sept. 18, p. B-1, B-4.

Anonymous. 2002.  Population boom slows in developing nations.  Mpls Star Tribune (Reprinted from New York Times), March 10.
Jan. 26 Implications of population growth. The Demographic Transition.

Demographic Transition
Jan. 28 Implications of population growth (cont.).  (Video: Sex, Lives, & Holes in the Sky).  
Jan.  31 Strategies for slowing the rate of population growth.  The demographic transition. Fackler, M. 2001.  In the Chinese countryside, many baby girls ‘missing.’  Mpls Star Tribune, Nov. 20, p. A-46.

Anonymous. 1999.  Population milestone for India: on the threshold of 1 billion.  Mpls Star Tribune, August 5, p. A-15.

Stanley, Kate. 1999.  India needs help of its daughters, but treats them as liability.  Mpls Star Tribune, Feb. 22, p. A-11.

Sontag, D. 2000.  In Gaza Strip, population explosion puts Palestinian officials in a tough position.  Mpls Star Tribune, Feb. 25, p. A-6.

United Nations Environment Program/World Conservation Union/World Wide Fund for Nature. 1991. Caring for the Earth - A Strategy for Sust. Living , pp. 43-51.
Feb.  2 U.S. and world economic growth. Gross Domestic Product and Purchasing Power Parity.
Feb.  4 U.S. and world economic growth (cont.). (Video: Econ. Prosperity Comes To China) Wright, F. 1996. China on the rise Mpls Star Tribune, March 11, p. A-9.

Becker, J. 2004.  China’s growing pains: more money, more stuff, more problems.   National Geographic, March, pp. 74-95. 
Feb.  7 U.S. and world economic growth (cont.).  (Video: Economic Growth in India). Boyd, J. 1999.  India's economy still fighting off effects of Nehru's socialism.   Mpls Star Tribune, Feb. 23, p. A-13.
Feb. 9 Implications of population and economic growth: consumption of food. Borlaug, N. 1998. Feeding a world of 10 billion people: the miracle ahead.

Leisinger, K. 1996.  Food security for a growing world population: 200 years after Malthus, still an unsolved problem.

Anonymous. 2001.  UN report warns of coming water crisis.  LosAngeles Times.  Reported in Mpls Star Tribune, Aug.14, p. A-5.

Schillinger, K. 2001.  Physicist touts saltwater farming to "feed billions."  Boston Globe.  Reprinted in Mpls Star Tribune, March 18, p. A-4.
Feb. 11 Implications of population and economic growth: consumption of food (cont.).

 

Feb. 14 Implications of population growth and economic growth: consumption of energy resources in the U.S. and worldwide. Kerr, R. 1998.  The next oil crisis looms large – and perhaps close.  Science 281 (Aug. 21), pp. 1128-1131.

Appenzeller, T. 2004.  The end of cheap oil.  National Geographic, June, pp. 80-109.

Energy Information Administration. 2000.  The year of peak production – when will worldwide convention oil production peak?

Drennen, T. and Erickson, J. 1998.  Who will fuel China?  Science 279 (March 6), p. 1483.  
Feb. 16 Implications of population and economic growth: consumption of energy resources in the U.S. and worldwide.   Von Sternberg, B. 2000.  Energy independence is no longer in vogue.  Mpls Star Tribune, April 3, pp. A-1, A-7.

Wampler, J.A. 2000.  Coal can remain in energy equation. Mpls. Star Tribune , May 15, p. A-11.
Feb. 18 Potential "new" sources of energy. Prospects for reducing energy use.  Energy conservation.  Energy efficient buildings.  Alternative sources of energy. Power, M. 2003.  Material world: resources at risk – introduction.  Builder, Jan., pp. 273-277.

Anonymous. 2004.  What is renewable energy?  National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Feb. 21 Alternative sources of energy (cont.) Hoff, M. 2003.  Catch the wind.  Minnesota Conservation Volunteer 66 (391): 10-21.

Meersman, T. 2001.  Wind farms churn-up need for power lines.  Mpls Star Tribune , pp. A-1, A-16.
Feb. 23 Environmental impacts of fossil fuel consumption.(Video: The Apocalypse and Al Gore)

 

Feb. 25 Implications of population and economic growth: consumption of non-renewable industrial raw materials. Non-metallic minerals and associated products - cements, fertilizers.  Plastics. Minerals  and metals. Brooks, D.B. and Andres, P.W.  1973. Mineral resources, economic growth, and world population.  In: Abelson, H. and Hammond, A.L. (ed.), Materials - Renewable and Non Renewable Resources, pp. 41-47.  Am. Assoc. for Adv. of Science, Spec. Science Compendia No. 4.
Feb. 28 Minerals and metals (cont.).  Industrial raw materials in international trade.  The U.S. import/export situation for industrial raw materials.  Environmental consequences of exploration, mining, processing, and use. Goodman, P.  2004.  Booming China devouring raw materials.  Washington Post, May 21, p. A01.

Brooke, J. 1998.  Mining's past is celebrated, but its future is panned.  New York Times. (Reprinted in Minneapolis Star Tribune Oct. 11, p. A 28).
Mar.    2 (Video: Mountains of Gold)

 

Mar.    4 No class.

 

Mar.    7 No class.

 

Mar.    9 Environmental consequences of minerals and metals exploration, gathering, processing, and use (cont.).   Mid-term exam review. Anonymous. 1997.  Australian miners staking claims to seabed minerals for the first time.  New York Times.  (Reprinted in Mpls Star Tribune, Dec. 21, p. A-8).
Mar. 11 Mid-term examination.  
Mar. 14-18 Spring Break -------------------------------------
Mar. 21 Recycling as a source of industrial raw materials. American Forest and Paper Association.  Recovered Paper Statistical Highlights - 2003 Edition.

Pearce, F. 1998. Burn me.  New Scientist 156 (2109): 26-30.

Warren, S. 1999.  The trouble with plastic.  Wall Street Journal. (Reprinted in Mpls Star Tribune, Nov. 26, pp. E-1, E-4).
Mar. 23 Recycling as a source of industrial raw materials (cont.)

 

Mar. 25 Implications of population and economic growth: impacts on forests and consumption of wood.   An overview of forests globally. Bowyer, J. L. Wood and other raw materials for the 21st century-where will they come from?  Forest Products Journal, 45(2): 17-24. [see Pdf file on class website]

Lague, D. 2003.  Asia’s forests head to China.  Wall Street Journal, December 23, p. A1.
Mar. 28 U.S. forests, wood consumption, and wood supply situation. Sedjo, R.A. 1995.  Forests – conflicting signals.  In: The True State of the Planet.  NY: Free Press, pp. 178 -209. [Find this reading in the Natural Resources Library – Reserve Section]
Mar. 30 History of forest exploitation, protection, and management in the United States.   National forests, national parks, and wilderness areas - the difference. MacCleery, D.W. 1992.  American Forests - a History of Resiliency and Recovery.  Durham, N.C.: Forest History Society, 58p. [This reading can be found in the Natural Resources Library – Reserve Section]
Apr.  1 Forestry – the fundamentals.

 

Apr.  4 The tropical deforestation problem. Diaz, K. 2004.  Brazil – the new breadbasket.  Mpls Star Tribune, March 7, p. A1, A12-A13.

Bowyer, J. 1997.  Strategies for ensuring the survival of the tropical forests: can logging be one of them?  Forest Products Journal 47(2): 15-24. [see Pdf file on class website]

McKenzie, G. 1999. Future in flames.  Mpls Star Tribune, Feb. 19, p. 4 A.
Apr.   6 The tropical deforestation problem (cont.) Anonymous. 2000.  Butterflies' haven faces new danger.  Los Angeles Times (Reprinted in Mpls Star Tribune, March 18, p. A-7).
Apr.   8 The expanding role of plantations in producing wood raw materials and protecting natural forests. Bowyer, J.L. 2001.  Environmental implications of wood production in intensively managed plantations.  Wood & Fiber Sci. 33(3): 318-333. [see Pdf file on class website]

Anonymous. 2003.  Study shows wood demand may lead to forest growth, not decline.   The Forestry Source, July, p. 12.
Apr. 11 The expanding role of plantations (cont.)  
Apr. 13 Non-timber forest products . . . the concept, the reality.  
Apr. 15 Agriculturally derived fiber and crop residues as raw materials. Bowyer, J. and Stockmann, V. 2000. Agricultural residues – an exciting bio-based raw material for the global panels industry.  Forest Products Journal 51(1): 10-21.
Apr. 18 Seeking to balance raw material needs and environmental protection: an examination of the U.S. forest products industry.  (Video: The Forest Wars) Bosworth, D. 2003.  Fires and forest health: our future is at stake.  Renewable Resources Journal 21(1): 6-10.
Apr. 20 Seeking to balance raw material needs and environmental protection (cont.). Dekker-Robinson, D. and Libby, W. 1998.  American forest policy - global ethical tradeoffs.  Bioscience 48(6): 471-477.

Berlik, M., Kittredge, D. and Foster, D.  2002.  The Illusion of Preservation – a Global Environmental Argument for Local Production of Natural Resources.  Harvard University, Harvard Forest Paper No. 26.  [see Pdf file on class website]

Bowyer, J. 1995.  The Clinton forest plan: a model for environmental planning?  Forest Perspectives 5(1): 18-19.
Apr. 22 Systematically assessing the environmental impacts associated with raw materials extraction, conversion, and use: life cycle inventory (LCI) and life cycle analysis (LCA). Lippke, B., J. Wilson, J. Perez-Garcia, J. Bowyer, and J. Meil. 2004.  CORRIM: Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials.  Forest Products Journal 54(6): 8-19. [see Pdf file on class website]
Apr. 25 Assessing the environmental impacts associated with raw materials extraction, conversion, and use (cont.).  Providing a basis for environmentally conscious consumption.   The U.S. Database Project/ forest certification programs. Buchanan, A.H. and Levine, S.B. 1999.  Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions.   Env. Science and Policy 2: 427-437.
Apr. 27 Consumption - U.S. and worldwide.  Environmental impacts of consumption. Durning, A. 1998. The secret life of an everyday thing.  Outdoor America 63(1): 20-24.

Bielski, V. 1996. Shopper, spare that tree! Sierra, Jul/Aug, pp. 38-41, 64-66.

Durning, A.T.  Long on things.  Sierra, Jan./Feb., pp. 60-62, 139-143.
Apr. 29 Consumption (cont.).  Possibilities of limiting consumption. Ehrbar, A. 2002.  Consumption tax.  Concise Encyclopedia of Economics.

Strigel, M. and Meine, C. 2001.  Intelligent Consumption Project Report.  Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, pp. iii-vi, 1-18.

Bowyer, J. 2003.  Consumption and the Sustainability Equation.  Oregon State University College of Forestry, Starker Lecture Series, November 7.
May  2 Separating fact from fiction.  Assessing various points of view.  Learning to think systematically. Stauder, J. 1995.  Changing course - teaching both sides of env. issues.  Liberal Ed., Summer, pp. 36-41.

Bowyer, J. 1995.  Fact vs. perception.  Forest Products Journal 45 (11/12): 17-24. [see Pdf file on class website]

MacCleery, D. 1996. When is a landscape natural?  The Minnesota Volunteer, Sept./Oct., pp. 42-52.
May  4 How to provide for expanding populations while protecting the environment.  Seeking to ensure sustainability. Carter, J. 2002.  Challenges for humanity – a beginning.  National Geographic, Feb., pp. 2-3.

Francis, D. J. 2000.  A simple light bulb offers better way of life in African villages.  Minneapolis Star Tribune, February 20, p. A-20.
May  6 How to provide for expanding populations while protecting the environment.  Seeking to ensure sustainability (cont.). United Nations Environment Program/World Conservation Union/World Wide Fund for Nature. Caring for the Earth - A Strategy for Sustainable Living, pp. 8-12, 43-51.

World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987.  From One Earth to One World - an Overview.  Oxford University Press, pp. 1-23.

Moore, P. 2000. Environmentalism for the 21st century.  Greenspirit.
Thursday, May 13, 10:30am - 12:30pm Final Examination

 

[1] Some of the assigned readings (i.e. for Mar. 29 and 31) can be found in the Reserve Section of the CNR/Forestry Library, B-50 NRAB.

 

 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.