Large portions of the upper Midwest have experienced exceptionally good drying conditions this fall and many soybeans have been harvested at well under 13% moisture (wet basis). The moisture content normally used for trading soybeans is 13%. When soybeans are sold at less than 13% moisture, sellers lose potential income because they could have sold additional weight if the soybeans had been closer to 13%. This situation creates an economic incentive for sellers to recondition overdry soybeans to increase their moisture content.
It is definitely illegal to add liquid water to any grain or oilseed to increase moisture content (and weight) prior to sale. But federal agencies have indicated that aerating crops during humid weather to maintain or improve crop quality is not illegal.
Yes, given enough time and a high enough airflow per bushel (cubic feet of air per minute per bushel of beans, or cfm/bu), it is possible to increase the moisture content of soybeans by aerating them with humid air. But here are some practical concerns and limitations:
If the fan is controlled so that it only operates during rewetting conditions and if systems with moderate fan power and moderate airflow per bushel are selected, the value of the weight gain should exceed the cost of the electricity to run the fan.
Table 1 shows the moisture content that soybeans would come to if exposed to different combinations of temperature and relative humidity for long periods of time. If you continuously aerated a bin of beans, they would tend to lose moisture during periods of low humidity and tend to gain moisture during periods of high humidity. To recondition soybeans, for example to 13% moisture, during normal fall temperatures of 30 to 60°F, you would want to control the fan so that it operates during weather that has an average relative humidity of 65 to 70%.
Note that the recommended moisture for beans that will be stored through winter is 13%. Beans that will be stored into the following summer should be about 12% moisture and beans that will be stored a year or more should be about 11% moisture. Table 1 indicates that bean moisture increases sharply as relative humidity increases, which means that it is quite easy to recondition soybeans to a moisture content that is too high for safe storage.
During reconditioning, the moisture of the whole bin doesnt change at once. A rewetting zone develops and moves slowly through the bin in the direction that the airflow is moving. This is similar to the way a drying zone moves through a drying bin. In most cases, there are not enough high humidity hours available in the fall to move a rewetting zone all the way through the bin. And in many cases, depending on how the fan is controlled, the parts of the bin that have been rewet will be too wet for safe storage. To avoid problems with spoilage or marketing of beans that are wetter than 13% moisture:
Table 1. Equilibrium moisture values (percent web basis) for soybeans
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the initial moisture content of the beans is 10% or less, controlling the fan so that it only runs when relative humidity of the air reaching the beans is greater than about 60% should result in rewetting. If you use a single humidistat to turn the fan on anytime humidity is greater than 60%, average humidity during the hours the fan operates should be well above 60% and the beans are likely to rewet to at least 13%. Since humidity is almost always higher at night than it is during the day, an alternative to a humidistat would be a timer set to just run the fan during nighttime hours.
If you arent equipped to mix or remove beans after reconditioning, you need to avoid rewetting them to moisture levels that are too high for safe storage. One approach is to add a second humidistat that stops the fan when relative humidity reaches very high levels. Or you could also install a more sophisticated aeration controller that monitors both temperature and humidity and only runs the fan when air conditions will bring the crop to the desired moisture content (for either drying or rewetting). The disadvantage of these approaches is that the fan doesnt run as many hours as it would with a single humidistat control and you would recondition fewer beans. Running the fan at high humidities and then mixing the wet and dry beans or removing the wet beans would result in reconditioning of more beans.
Reconditioning time depends primarily on airflow per bushel and on humidity of the air moving through the beans. Reconditioning is fastest when airflow per bushel is high and humidity is high. Using a bin equipped with a full perforated floor, a good-sized fan that can deliver at least 0.75 cfm/bu, and a humidistat to prevent fan operation at low humidities will provide the quickest reconditioning. Even with this airflow, it would probably take at least a month of fan operation to move a rewetting front all the way through the bin. Using storage bins equipped with low-airflow aeration systems to recondition soybeans will require many months to move a rewetting front all the way through the bin.
Soybeans swell when they absorb moisture, and experience during floods indicates that soaking the bottom few feet of beans in a bin can result in enough pressure to rupture bin walls. And a Michigan researcher reports that an attempt to recondition pea beans resulted in bin damage. We dont have enough information on reconditioning soybeans through use of aeration to know whether this procedure can damage bins, but the process will definitely increase stress on the walls. Using a vertical stirring auger to mix layers of dry and wet beans, or periodically removing wet layers of beans from a bin might be ways to reduce outward pressure generated during reconditioning.
If its possible to use downward airflow, that would be preferred for the following reasons:
Most bins equipped for high airflow per bushel are designed for upward airflow and it is not easy to reverse the airflow direction. These upward-airflow systems can still be used for reconditioning, but recognize that you will have slightly greater stresses on the bin walls and you will need to probe to the bottom of the bin to monitor bean moisture changes. Also, if you are using a humidistat to control the fan, you might want to place the humidistats sensing element between the fan and the bin so that it senses the air actually reaching the beans. Or if thats not convenient, increase the humidistat setting about five percentage points to compensate for the drying effect of the fan heat.
Caution: If you are able to reverse the airflow direction in a bin that was originally designed for upward airflow, make sure that roof vents are open anytime the fan is operating to avoid damaging the roof.
To increase chances of success in using aeration to recondition soybeans:
The information in this article is based on ASAE Paper No. 99-6046, Aeration Strategies for Reconditioning Dry Soybeans by W. F. Wilcke, R. V. Morey, D. J. Hansen, and R. A. Meronuck.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
This page is part of the Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department web at http://www.bae.umn.edu/