2002 Annual Report

Home

Resources

Teaching

Research

Extension/Outreach

Publications

Grants


Research

Characteristics of Erosion Control Measures and Their Impact on Erosion

Bruce Wilson, Associate Professor
Bradley Hansen, Assistant Scientist
Udai Singh, Research Associate
Hung Nguyen, Research Associate
Anita Thompson, USDA National Needs Fellow

Funding Source

Minnesota Department of Transportation

Objective

The goals of the project are to develop a better understanding of the interactions of erosion control measures and fundamental erosion principles and to extend the existing database to longer hillsides and to sandy soils. The specific research objectives are:

  1. To determine the vegetative growth and erosion using blankets for sandy soils and for relatively long slopes.
  2. To determine the vegetative growth and hydraulic properties of turf reinforcement mats using field plots and measurements in a laboratory flume.
  3. To link the blanket and turf characteristics to vegetative growth, and to detachment and transport of sediment using previously published data.

Project Description

Erosion control blankets and synthetic turf mats are widely used to reduce erosion from construction sites. Their effectiveness is currently evaluated by empirical investigations. Although this approach is useful, each new product requires expensive and tedious field experiments. Long-term progress in selecting erosion control measures requires a better understanding of the interactions of the control measures with the detachment and transport of sediment. The effectiveness of blankets and turf mats can then be evaluated using simulation tools instead of field experiments.

The first goal of the project is to extend the current Minnesota database on the effectiveness of erosion control blankets. This will be accomplished by using field plots on long hillsides with sandy soils. The second goal is to obtain a better understanding of the interactions of erosion control measures and fundamental erosion principles. The impact of blankets/mats on the shear stress acting on soil particles will be investigated using a laboratory flume. Additional insight will be obtained by compiling and analyzing previously published data.

Results

Twelve plots with slope lengths of 30.5-m and twelve plots with slope lengths of 18.3 m were installed to study erosion from a highway embankment. Four erosion control treatments with three replicates were studied for each set of plot lengths. The treatments for the 30.5-m plots were straw blanket, wood blanket, spray emulsion product, and straw mulch. The treatments for the 18.3-m plots were straw blanket, spray-emulsion product, straw mulch, and no erosion control measures (bare soil). Data were collected for two different stages of vegetative growth (spring and fall) and for two different initial moisture contents (dry and wet). A low-impact sprinkler system was designed and used to apply water to the plots. Runoff and sediment data were collected for ninety-six different runs. Above-ground biomass was also measured.

Above-ground biomass data were measured for each plot twice during the growing seasons: once in the spring and once in the fall after the completion of the wet runs. The spray-emulsion plots had the smallest amount of biomass in the spring. No other trends in biomass data were apparent. Different rainfall depths among plots made direct analyses of runoff depths and sediment loads more difficult. To account for differences in rainfall depths, the curve number was used as an index of runoff characteristics. The curve number appeared to be most strongly influenced by the initial moisture content of the plots. Curve numbers for the fall dry-runs were typically smaller than those observed for the spring dry-runs. Vegetative cover and initial moisture contents were different between these two sets of runs. The curve numbers for the wet runs in spring and fall were roughly equivalent. With the possible exception of smaller runoff depth from the spray-emulsion plots during the spring runs, no trends in runoff depths with treatment was apparent. Sediment load was substantially smaller for the fall runs than the spring runs, likely the result of greater vegetative cover. Relative sediment loads for the bare treatment were roughly eight times larger than those observed for the other treatments. This trend was observed for both wet and dry conditions and for spring and fall seasons. There were no other apparent trends for the spring runs. For the fall runs, the blankets and spray-emulsion relative sediment load was consistently smaller than that observed for the straw mulch plot.

Particle detachment by surface runoff is fundamentally dependent on the shear forces acting on them (particle shear). The effect of erosion control blankets on reducing particle shear was explored in this study using a laboratory flume and hot-film anemometry techniques. Experiments were conducted to measure the impact of blanket type on the percentage of the total shear acting on the bed. Another set of experiments investigated particle shear as a function of blanket height above the flume floor. These experiments showed a slight increase in particle shear as the distance from the bottom of the blanket to the flume floor increased. Experiments were also conducted to study the effect of fastener spacing on particle shear. The data suggests that stapling density plays an important role in reducing the shear stress responsible for particle detachment. The percentage of total shear acting on the bed was less than 13.2% in all experiments, indicating the importance of shear partitioning in the design of erosion control systems.
The project also attempted to develop predictive relationships of blanket performance using a regression analysis. Sediment load and vegetative density data from TxDOT test facility were compiled and blanket characteristics were requested from manufacturers. The number of blanket characteristics obtained was too limited to evaluate the usefulness of possible regression equations.


by Webmaster
© Regents of the University of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy Statement